作者:
david graeber
/
/
大卫·温格罗 出版社: farrar, straus and giroux 副标题: a new history of humanity 出版年: 2021-10-19 页数: 704 定价: gbp 23.56 装帧: hardcover isbn: 9780374157357
a trailblazing account of human history, challenging our most fundamental assumptions about social evolution--from the development of agriculture and cities to the emergence of the state, political violence, and social inequality--and revealing new possibilities for human emancipation.
for generations, our remote ancestors have been cast as primitive and childlike--either free ...
a trailblazing account of human history, challenging our most fundamental assumptions about social evolution--from the development of agriculture and cities to the emergence of the state, political violence, and social inequality--and revealing new possibilities for human emancipation.
for generations, our remote ancestors have been cast as primitive and childlike--either free and equal innocents, or thuggish and warlike. civilization, we are told, could be achieved only by sacrificing those original freedoms or, alternatively, by taming our baser instincts. david graeber and david wengrow show how such theories first emerged in the eighteenth century as a conservative reaction to powerful critiques of european society posed by indigenous observers and intellectuals. revisiting this encounter has startling implications for how we make sense of human history today, including the origins of farming, property, cities, democracy, slavery, and civilization itself.
drawing on pathbreaking research in archaeology and anthropology, the authors show how history becomes a far more interesting place once we learn to throw off our conceptual shackles and perceive what's really there. if humans did not spend 95 percent of their evolutionary past in tiny bands of hunter-gatherers, what were they doing all that time? if agriculture, and cities, did not mean a plunge into hierarchy and domination, then what kinds of social and economic organization did they lead to? what was really happening during the periods that we usually describe as the emergence of the state? the answers are often unexpected, and suggest that the course of human history may be less set in stone, and more full of playful, hopeful possibilities, than we tend to assume.
the dawn of everything fundamentally transforms our understanding of the human past and offers a path toward imagining new forms of freedom, new ways of organizing society. this is a monumental book of formidable intellectual range, animated by curiosity, moral vision, and a faith in the power of direct action.
david graeber was a professor of anthropology at the london school of economics. he is the author of debt: the first 5,000 years and bullshit jobs: a theory, and was a contributor to harper's magazine, the guardian, and the baffler. an iconic thinker and renowned activist, his early efforts in zuccotti park made occupy wall street an era-defining movement. he died on september ...
david graeber was a professor of anthropology at the london school of economics. he is the author of debt: the first 5,000 years and bullshit jobs: a theory, and was a contributor to harper's magazine, the guardian, and the baffler. an iconic thinker and renowned activist, his early efforts in zuccotti park made occupy wall street an era-defining movement. he died on september 2, 2020.
david wengrow is a professor of comparative archaeology at the institute of archaeology, university college london, and has been a visiting professor at new york university. he is the author of three books, including what makes civilization?. wengrow conducts archaeological fieldwork in various parts of africa and the middle east.
原文摘录
· · · · · ·
( )
now, we should be clear here: social theory, always, necessarily, involves a bit of simplification. for instance, almost any human action might be said to have a political aspect, an economic aspect, a psycho-sexual aspect and so forth. social theory is largely a game of make-believe in which we pretend, just for the sake of argument, that there's just one thing going on: essentially, we reduce everything to a cartoon so as to be able to detect patterns that would be otherwise invisible. as a result, all real progress in social science has been rooted in the courage to say things that are, in the final analysis, slightly ridiculous: the work of karl marx, sigmund frued or claude levi-strauss being only particular salient cases in point. one must simplify the world to discover something new... (查看原文)
2赞2022-03-16 06:47:14
—— 引自第75页
if human beings, through most of our history, have moved back and forth fluidly between different social arrangements, assembling and dismantling hierarchies on a regular basis, maybe the real question should be ‘how did we get stuck?’ how did we end up in one single mode? how did we lose that political self-consciousness, once so typical of our species? how did we come to treat eminence and subservience not as temporary expedients, or even the pomp and circumstance of some kind of grand seasonal theatre, but as inescapable elements of the human condition? if we started out just playing games, at what point did we forget that we were playing? (查看原文)
3赞2022-05-14 07:59:17
—— 引自第124页
>
喜欢读"the dawn of everything"的人也喜欢
· · · · · ·
9.1
8.7
7.9
短评
· · · · · ·
(
)
//
1
感觉重新认识了人类的历史,也很喜欢graeber循序渐进接近真相的思辨过程。
1美国
mind blowing!推翻了一堆anthro预设,包括agrarian society“取代”hunter gather society等等假说被他批判成想象中的理论等等
0
3.5 took me a long time to finish it but i did. it was eye opening how wrong some established theories in the field of anthropology are. but overall the book was boring as hell. i’m just not that conc...3.5 took me a long time to finish it but i did. it was eye opening how wrong some established theories in the field of anthropology are. but overall the book was boring as hell. i’m just not that concerned with the subject matter.()
i felt skeptical when i read the first 6 chapters. really? are you sure? can you prove it? but it gets more interesting, especially the last 3 chapters? seems that we are as human beings are not that ...i felt skeptical when i read the first 6 chapters. really? are you sure? can you prove it? but it gets more interesting, especially the last 3 chapters? seems that we are as human beings are not that hopeless. there is still chance to social equality.()
第一章总结: 作者的目的是重新书写人类历史,改写目前通行但错误的叙述和叙述逻辑,改写盛行的以不平等 (inequality) 为开端发问的人类历史思考与叙述方式。 目前大历史的主流叙述其实都在一个错误的设问下展开,即探寻不平等的起源是什么 (what is the origin of inequality)...
()
1
感觉重新认识了人类的历史,也很喜欢graeber循序渐进接近真相的思辨过程。
1 美国
mind blowing!推翻了一堆anthro预设,包括agrarian society“取代”hunter gather society等等假说被他批判成想象中的理论等等
0
3.5 took me a long time to finish it but i did. it was eye opening how wrong some established theories in the field of anthropology are. but overall the book was boring as hell. i’m just not that conc... 3.5 took me a long time to finish it but i did. it was eye opening how wrong some established theories in the field of anthropology are. but overall the book was boring as hell. i’m just not that concerned with the subject matter. ()
2 美国
被大家安利又是感兴趣的话题抱以厚望,但是发现这书是真的不适合听,听得东一榔头西一棒槌非常零散。有机会再找文字版读一遍吧。
2 湖南
非常非常mindfucking,可惜英语太烂了读得很慢。目前读完近半,作者反欧洲中心论、反社会进化论的观点对于自由派也吸引力十足,“溯源”用得相当之多,足见其对思想史的了如指掌。很坦率地毫不掩饰自己的立场,行文间充斥着对于相反观念(同时也是延续至今的主流观点)的大咖的调侃乃至辛辣讽刺。所以这书为啥两年了还没有简体中文引进?
0 日本
越读越尊重他 rest in peace
0 日本
开头[霍布斯vs卢梭、北美印第安土著批评中世纪欧洲]给我砸懵了,后来悟了。圆圈轮流、空心聚居、实心自治、schizogenesis、play farming、magic&nature&laboratory&females、南美迷幻剂、爱琴海女性艺术岛、土著女智者挫败路易十四殖民军……末世、未来科幻、无限流小世界或镜花缘类奇遇记,可以从这里汲取灵感,别总是困在桃花源/伊甸园、社达丛林这两套狭隘的体系... 开头[霍布斯vs卢梭、北美印第安土著批评中世纪欧洲]给我砸懵了,后来悟了。圆圈轮流、空心聚居、实心自治、schizogenesis、play farming、magic&nature&laboratory&females、南美迷幻剂、爱琴海女性艺术岛、土著女智者挫败路易十四殖民军……末世、未来科幻、无限流小世界或镜花缘类奇遇记,可以从这里汲取灵感,别总是困在桃花源/伊甸园、社达丛林这两套狭隘的体系里。 ()
0 广东
脑洞大开,摒弃了陈旧的历史观,人类的未来终究是大多数人在不被胁迫不被诱导下的自由选择,看完的结论是无政府是开放性的,可以有可以无,一切应该在人们的自由选择
0 上海
i felt skeptical when i read the first 6 chapters. really? are you sure? can you prove it? but it gets more interesting, especially the last 3 chapters? seems that we are as human beings are not that ... i felt skeptical when i read the first 6 chapters. really? are you sure? can you prove it? but it gets more interesting, especially the last 3 chapters? seems that we are as human beings are not that hopeless. there is still chance to social equality. ()
0 美国
伪概念过多,写的也抽象,不推荐